MuscleTech should be shot with all their bogus hype geezus... That FAQ page that they posted contains 80% hype, 20% studies... It's bullcrap "Nanomill" technology is the same as what others called microtinized creatine processing.
At 2.1g/serving, it costs more than other purer CEE products no doubt, in addition, all experts agree that Monohydrate is still the best out there with regards to creatine products, as monohydrate is the only with decades of proven effectiveness.
CEE is promising, unlike serums that caused a great stir a year ago only to be concluded that it's 100% crap. But then again, the price of CEE right now is jacked up by non-standard processing and unclear benefits right now, so it's not really a wise choice to decide it's better than monohydrate.
If you have the dough, go ahead and give it a shot, most people claims it's better than monohydrate and it can't be crap since it's derived from regular creatine monohydrate anyway (added esther link).
But don't fall for stupid marketing tactics of MT... Be smart.
To make it clear, in my opinion (based on reports read), CEE does seem to be the next great supplement. But banking on MT is like banking your money on Khaos hehe, pure marketing crap, spend $5 for something you can buy for $2.
quote: Originally posted by: theveed " To make it clear, in my opinion (based on reports read), CEE does seem to be the next great supplement. But banking on MT is like banking your money on Khaos hehe, pure marketing crap, spend $5 for something you can buy for $2.
Here's a good roundtable discussion at BB.com
http://www.bodybuilding.com/fun/south96.htm "
hahahaha khaos... yah i know... i've read about it din... kaya nga yun tinetext ko sa iyo diba? disposal time! hehehehe kaso yun lang naalala ko na brand eh... pero do you think okay CEE? or tri-creatine malate kasi ng SAN v12 okay rin since minimal water retention eh... gusto ko kasi lumakas lang... hehehehe
